June 2015 Audio Highlights by LexisPSL Property

Welcome to this month’s audio highlights by LexisPSL Property!

In this month’s edition Melissa Moore looks at:

• Accidental Mortgage Discharge & Rectification;
• Replies to Enquiries / Fraudulent Misrepresentation;
• Service Charges: Recent cases on Reserve Funds; Apportionment; and Consultation
• Right to Manage – costs.

To receive next month’s edition by email please subscribe using the sidebar on the right –>

Audio Version (Play below or Download Audio Version):

(Note: your browser may be set to play media files rather than download them. In that case please right click and select “Save As” in order to save the mp3 file.)


Video version with supporting slides:

Further Reading (linked items require a subscription to or free trial of LexisPSL):

Easements—LPA 1925, s 62 and permissions

The title register—alteration, rectification and indemnity

Section 62 rights arose despite no diversity of occupation

Replies to enquiries under the spotlight

Landlord forced to use reserve fund

Council forced to give tenant credit for works funding

Prejudice in statutory residential service charge consultations

Residential—statutory consultation procedure for service charges

Method of service charge calculation altered on enfranchisement

Withdrawal of right to manage applications—costs

Model Commercial Leases: A property success story?

The letting agent-landlord relationship – a dangerous liaison?

Source: LexisNexis Purpose Built
June 2015 Audio Highlights by LexisPSL Property

The UK housing shortage and its effect on the property sector

How is the housing shortage in the UK affecting the property sector? Hugh Lumby, partner and head of the global real estate practice at Ashurst, highlights some of the current problems facing the property market and explores the government policies that are seeking to tackle those problems.
What are the current issues surrounding UK housing stock shortage, and what are the underlying causes of these issues?

The housing shortage has been making headlines for a long time and featured in every political party’s manifesto before the 2015 general election. As the UK population continues to increase, the housing shortage becomes more acute and first time buyers are struggling to get on the housing ladder—particularly in London and the South East.

There are various government initiatives designed to address the soaring cost of buying a house. These include the right to buy ISA and the starter homes scheme—which aims to provide 200,000 homes at a 20% discount for first time buyers in England under the age of 40. However, a number of commentators have suggested that these measures may not make homes more affordable, as sellers may simply increase their asking price because of these buyer incentives.

Furthermore, the government seems to focus on home ownership, but it is important not to lose sight of the role that the private rented sector can play in solving the housing crisis.

The government’s decision to extend the right to buy scheme is an example of the government’s desire to promote home ownership. The extension of the scheme will allow more social housing tenants to buy their homes at a discount. This may have won votes at the general election, but it is difficult to see how this will solve the housing crisis unless they replace all the council houses that are sold. History tells us there is no guarantee that this will happen.

How is the shortage affecting the property sector?

Developers need available land, planning permission and finance to build houses. The government’s plans in the proposed Housing Bill to encourage development on brownfield land will release more land, but these sites need to be identified with care and any contamination issues need to be properly addressed. Developers are still grappling with complex planning laws and lengthy delays in the planning process.

Estate agents are, in certain areas, faced with a shortage of properties on their books, particularly properties that are suitable for first time buyers. Without first time buyers entering the market, those further up the chain cannot move on—and so the market stalls.

Property lawyers are there to ensure the parties involved in a development are properly advised. Uncertainties and complexities in the planning laws and regulations means that lawyers have to interpret what the law means, which can lead to protracted negotiations.

To what extent are planning laws affecting the situation?

The government has already introduced a number of planning measures designed to boost housing development. For example, they introduced Vacant Building Credit (VBC) to incentivise developers to bring vacant buildings back into use by reducing the contribution to affordable housing if certain requirements are met.

However, determining when VBC applies is more complex than one would at first think. It has also proved controversial as it applies across the board. You may find that a scheme benefits from VBC where, in actual fact, the original affordable housing contribution would not make the scheme unviable.

Any measures that speed up the planning process are welcome and one such measure was introduced by the Development Management Procedure (England) Order 2015, SI 2015/595, which provides for deemed discharge of planning conditions where the planning authority has failed to determine the application in time. Additionally, the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015, SI 2015/596, includes new permitted development rights to increase residential development.

These are:

  • up to 500 square metres of storage or distribution buildings to change use to residential housing within a three year period, subject to prior approval, and
  • up to 150 square metres of amusement arcades, centres and casinos to change use to residential housing, subject to prior approval.

However, the permitted development right, which allows conversion of offices to residential housing, has not been extended and will still expire on 31 May 2016.

How are local planning authorities handling the current crisis?

The planning authorities are in the unenviable position of trying to manage the need for more housing against local opposition to development. Although the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) contains a presumption in favour of development, local opposition can effectively scupper proposed schemes. While there have been significant reforms to the judicial review process, more needs to be done to prevent unmeritorious claims which stymie development.

What are your predictions for the future? Is the situation likely to improve?

Ultimately, development needs available land and suitable local infrastructure. The government’s proposal in the Housing Bill for a statutory register for brownfield land to help meet the goal of having Local Development Orders in place on 90% of brownfield land by 2020 seeks to address this need. However, it is unlikely to solve the problem. The thorny issue of the green belt and balancing the protecting of our countryside with finding suitable sites for housing has not gone away.

There is still work to be done to speed up the planning process and to simplify complex planning rules. Certain aspects of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010, SI 2010/948, are still difficult to interpret and are unnecessarily complicated.

It is clear that the private sector cannot solve this problem on its own. Developers bring forward schemes that will be profitable—after all, that is their business. Thus, the government needs to ensure this is coupled with sufficient provision of social housing for the less well off.

The Queen’s Speech on 27 May 2015 mentioned the upcoming Cities and Local government Devolution Bill, which will devolve powers to English cities by appointing directly elected mayors to take control of housing, planning and transport policies. The government believes this will give cities the ability to grow their own local economies and could help to alleviate the housing divide between north and south.

Another positive is the recent government consultation on allowing business improvement districts to engage more easily in business-led neighbourhood plans. This will allow businesses and landowners to consider all local interest when setting planning and development frameworks.

Interviewed by Nicola Laver.

The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.

Source: LexisNexis Purpose Built
The UK housing shortage and its effect on the property sector

UKELA 2015 – See you there!

UKELA 2015 – See you there!

Welcome!

LexisPSL Environment is very pleased to be attending this year’s annual UKELA conference. Two of our in-house experts, Hayley Tam and Simone Davidson will be at the event and would be delighted to see you at our stand.

In your delegate pack: Our notes…and yours!

This year’s theme is “Water, water, everywhere“.

UKELA Notebook Front CoverUKELA Notebook NotepagesWith such an impressive line-up of speakers for this year’s event we were delighted to be given an opportunity to join to the conversation by contributing to the delegate packs. We’ve included topical articles and resources as well as plenty of space for your own notes - all packed into a handy wirebound A5 notebook. The content follows the structure of the day’s events and is divided into three sections – one for each plenary session.

For Plenary 1 “What you need to know about environmental water law” we have:

- Article: Water pollution regulation

- Checklist: water-related permits

- Table: Key water quality directives

For Plenary 2 “Flooding” we have:

- Article: How can you help your clients investigate flood risk?

- Checklist: Flood searches (produced in partnership with Argyll Environmental)

- Article: Flood risk and insurance (by Duncan Spencer of the EDIA)

For Plenary 3 “Hot topics in water” we have:

- Article: Fracking environmental issues

- Checklist: Fracking permits

Also in our notebook:

UKELA Notebook Twitter CompEnter our competition and help to fund clean water projects in Africa

We are giving away four stainless steel Givemetap bottles.

Each bottle purchased helps fund clean water projects in Africa.

Anyone with a Givemetap bottle is entitled to free refills of tap water from any participating outlet (found via their app).

Click on the image for full details. Terms and conditions apply.

 

UKELA Notebook Webinar AdEnvironmental Law Webinar Series 2015: Exclusive early-bird discount for UKELA delegates!

UKELA has recently surveyed its membership to determine which issues are of most concern to them and we will be using this feedback to develop a new webinar series. See the image for details of how to claim your 15% early bird discount!

 

 

Source: LexisNexis Purpose Built
UKELA 2015 – See you there!

Leasehold Enfranchisement: Blessing or curse?

Leasehold Enfranchisement: Blessing or curse?

What have been the successes and failures of enfranchisement? Mark Loveday, barrister at Tanfield Chambers considers this issue, confirms the key enfranchisement cases (including Westbrook) and offers his insight concerning the future of enfranchisement.
Leasehold Enfranchisement
The term ‘leasehold enfranchisement’ includes rights to:

  • extend a residential lease, and
  • acquire the freehold

The purpose of those rights is to enable tenants to continue occupation of their residential property at a fair price and on fair terms. It also allows leaseholders to maintain capital value and the ability to mortgage.

Has enfranchisement been a blessing or a curse?

The Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (LRA 1967) is nearing its 50th birthday and the Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (LRHUDA 1993) is old enough to have left university and qualified as a lawyer. Like all grown-up children, they can be both a blessing and a curse.

From a social point of view, the blessing has been that enfranchisement has undoubtedly extended the ‘property owning democracy’ dreamt of by successive governments. Many tens of thousands of house owners have acquired their freeholds, lessees of flats have been able to acquire secure long lease terms and groups of lessees have been able to acquire the freeholds of blocks of flats.

The curse is that in many cases, the rules have been exploited by commercial and semi-commercial developers seeking to acquire properties—often at a perceived discount to the market price. Moreover, newly enfranchised freeholders of blocks of flats may not always make good landlords.

What have been the key challenges around enfranchisement since its introduction?

The main challenges are that the law is complex, frequently inaccessible, and the valuation principles opaque. When combined with high property values, these considerations mean that leasehold enfranchisement has generated significantly more work for the higher courts and tribunals than almost any other area of property litigation.

What have been the defining cases?

There is no room for anything other than the seven House of Lords and Supreme Court cases:

  • Cadogan v Sportelli [2007] EWCA Civ 1042, [2008] 2 All ER 220—hope value
  • Aggio v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd [2008] UKHL 44, [2008] 4 All ER 382—lease extensions for headleases
  • Arbib v Earl Cadogan [2005] 3 EGLR 139—deferment rate
  • Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties [2008] UKHL 5, [2008] 2 All ER 759—meaning of ‘house’
  • Malekshad v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd [2002] UKHL 49, [2003] 1 All ER 193—meaning of ‘house’
  • Shalson v Keepers and Governors of the Free Grammar School of John Lyon [2003] UKHL 32, [2003] 3 All ER 975—improvements.
How will the settlement in the Westbrook case affect enfranchisement?

Westbrook involved what was once the largest block of flats in the world. Mann J held that the lessees of the flats could acquire the freehold under LRA 1967 and LRHUDA 1993. Mann J considered a number of important points, including:

  • company ‘schemes’ in enfranchisement
  • the meaning of ‘residential purposes’ in LRHUDA 1993
  • the various tests for the validity of LRHUDA 1993, s 13 (s 13 notice); and
  • transactions at an undervalue under the Insolvency Act 1986, s 423

The judge rejected all the freeholder’s objections to enfranchisement. Although an appeal was expected, the matter settled shortly afterwards.

There was a lot in the 455-paragraph judgment of Mann J in Westbrook—perhaps unsurprising, given that it involved the largest collective enfranchisement ever made. The subsequent settlement left some of Mann J’s conclusions unresolved by the Court of Appeal.

In my view, some of the most intractable issues concern the simple question whether an initial LRHUDA 1993, s 13notice claim is valid. In Cadogan Estates Ltd v Morris [1998] EWCA Civ 1671, [1999] 1 EGLR 59, the Court of Appeal held that initial notices which specified an ‘unrealistic’ purchase price was invalid, but effectively ducked the question as to what test should be applied. Mann J grappled with the issue, but rejected the various objective tests offered to him by counsel. He settled on a subjective test as to whether a proposal was realistic or not. That is not very helpful for most practitioners who need to advise fairly quickly whether a notice is valid or not, and it had been hoped the Court of Appeal might have reconsidered the test.

What are your predictions for the future of enfranchisement?

The latest reforms, namely the Leasehold Reform (Amendment) Act 2014, only tweaked the legislation. There is no obvious sign of further major legislative developments.

This area of work is market driven. As long as there are residential leaseholds with high values, there will always be a future for enfranchisement.

Interviewed by Susan Ghaiwal.

The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.

Don’t miss out on this FREE Practice Note:

Mixed Use Devs Front Page

When a proposed mixed use development includes a residential element, a degree of caution should be exercised. A number of potential risks/issues arise. A number of these can, however, be avoided/reduced by careful ownership structuring at the outset. This note details the most common pitfalls and risks and sets out (including detailed diagrams) the best structures to minimize risk and safeguard viability in the most common scenarios. CLICK HERE FOR YOUR FREE DOWNLOAD!

Keywords: mixed use developments; right to manage; right to buy; right to extended lease; service charge issues; ownership structures.

Source: LexisNexis Purpose Built
Leasehold Enfranchisement: Blessing or curse?